Smoking Should Be Banned In Public Places IELTS Essay However, there is an argument that banning smoking in public places does away with the human rights of smokers. They also claim that as far as tobacco products are sold publically and advertised through media, preventing smoking will not yield any fruitful effect, it can only act as a gimmick. So, what can be done is to adopt a middle · Our writers will create an original "Smoking Ban in Public Places" essay for you. Create order. Many are led to believe that log exposure to secondhand smoke can put you at risk for many diseases such as heart disease and cancer. This topic is very controversial because the facts are not always portrayed. As Grier looked at in his research he noted that smokers are more in danger than Smoking should be banned in public places The government of the United States, should ban smoking in all public places because of the adverse effects of passive smoking on smokers, non-smokers and the environment. In the recent years, the population of people who smoke in the US has significantly increased. People still choose to smoke even when they have adequate knowledge of
Essay on Smoking In Public Places Should Be Banned - SaralStudy
Have you ever been out in public and notice someone smoking? According to Jacob Grier, freelance writer and bartender, smoking bans show no improvement in heart attacks. Many people may disagree with this statement but a lot of them follow what the media says and not the actual facts.
Harvard Heart Letter published an article promoting the dangerous of being exposed to secondhand smoke. Many are led to believe that log exposure to secondhand smoke can put you at risk for many diseases such as heart disease and cancer.
This topic is very controversial because the facts are not always portrayed. As Grier looked at in his research he noted that smokers are more in danger than those exposed to secondhand smoke. According to the article, ban smoking in public places essay, secondhand smoke can lead to diseases such as heart disease, lung cancer and asthma. The article also state that some technology used to filter out smoke or clean air is found to be inconclusive. The authors suggest if you live with a smoker to ask them to quit, smoke in a designated room, or outside.
Grier argues that some sample sizes in the studies were too small and proved nothing. The article also states that larger sample sizes still found no correlation between the two. The article notes that secondhand smoke is not as dangerous as the media has portrayed it to be. Grier also states that since the facts state that secondhand smoke is not as dangerous, that some laws should be eliminated, and smokers should have some rights back. The author emphasizes the psychological impacts that smoking bans have on smokers.
Both of these authors further explain their viewpoints on the controversial topic of smoking, ban smoking in public places essay, secondhand smoke, and smoking bans, ban smoking in public places essay. This topic may seem like it has an easy answer, but many people cannot agree on the right answer. His article is showcased in the Slate magazine, which is a political and current events type of publication.
The purpose of this article is to inform non-smokers that their exposure to secondhand smoke is not as dangerous as they have been told and to state the contrary evidence about smoking in the media. Grier is a freelance writer and a bartender.
Grier discusses many studies that show no correlation of decrease in heart attacks from smoking bans. For example, Grier looks at the study in Helena, Montana, where six months after the smoking ban the rate of heart attacks decreased by 60 percent. Grier argues that the sample size was way too small to make a connection between the two.
Grier notices ban smoking in public places essay trend in the small sample size of these different studies. He argues that the decrease in heart attacks is coincidental. Harvard Heart Letter argues how dangerous exposure to secondhand smoke is and how they can help prevent it. This article emphasizes the bad exposure to secondhand smoke. Both Grier and Harvard Heart Letter agree that secondhand smoke can be dangerous.
Grier states that secondhand smoke can potentially be dangerous, but the dangers are not as bad as portrayed in the media. Both articles agree that creating designated smoking areas for smoker would be a middle ground for party sides, ban smoking in public places essay. Non-smokers would know to avoid these particular areas and would not be exposed to secondhand smoke, ban smoking in public places essay.
Smokers would have an area where they could freely smoke and not have to worry about backlash from smokers. Even though these authors have some similarities, there differences are much greater. Grier argues that long exposure to secondhand smoke is not as dangerous as it is portrayed to be. He states that people who are chronically exposed to secondhand smoke have rates of getting cancer is just 1.
This evidence is shocking to many, but many still refuse to acknowledge the truth. Harvard Heart Letter argues that the dangers of being exposed to secondhand smoke increase your risk of heart attacks.
Grier argues that the science has shown no correlation of decrease in heart attacks since smoking bans. While some studies do state this, Grier acknowledges that the sample sizes are too small and in some cases is just a coincidence.
He also argues that those decreases may not even be related to secondhand smoke. On the other hand, Harvard Heart Letter believes that smoking bans will help make the ban smoking in public places essay healthy for everyone. Grier states that there is no clear evidence that states secondhand smoke causes many diseases. Harvard Heart Letter stresses the fact that chronic exposure to secondhand smoke causes many diseases such as heart disease and cancer.
Grier argues that the evidence proves no correlation between decrease in certain illnesses following smoking bans. This leads him to believe that some bans on smoking should be lifted following the contrary evidence that was discovered. Harvard Heart Letter believes that smoking bans are important for the health of society.
Another major point that Grier stresses is the fact that smoking bans have a psychological impact on smokers. He states that smokers are never asked about their experiences or how they feel about the bans. Many smokers feel they are being discriminated against. I believe that Grier is very knowledgeable and has lots of evidence to support his claims. I agree with ban smoking in public places essay fact the secondhand smoke is not as harmful as it is portrayed to be. I disagree with the Harvard Heart Letter on its exaggeration of the exposure to secondhand smoke.
He looks beyond the research and states what the truth really is. I wonder if a designated smoking area would help solve some of the controversy between the two sides? I believe that the main issues with this topic is if non- smokers have the right to take away the rights of smokers and if smokers have the right to smoke freely anywhere they chose, ban smoking in public places essay.
I believe a middle ground should be put in place that will create ban smoking in public places essay designated smoking area. Even though this seems like a simple solution I agree that this solution may not please everyone and may still remain a controversial issue. This would not expose nonsmokers to secondhand smoke and smokers would have a place they could smoke freely.
This would help smokers feel a little more included in society. In conclusion, Grier and Harvard Heart Letter discuss completely different points about smoking, secondhand smoke and smoking bans. Grier focuses on the truth that secondhand smoke is not as bad as it seems, and studies show no correlation of decrease in heart attacks since smoking bans. Therefore, he believes some laws should be eliminated and smokers should have some rights back.
Harvard Heart Letter argues that secondhand smoke is terrifically dangerous and more smoking bans should be put into effect. Both authors deliver their points in different very different ways. Even after all the research the question still remains is secondhand smoke dangerous?
Smoking Ban in Public Places. com, Feb 05, Accessed May 31, comFeb We will send an essay sample to you in 2 Hours. If you need help faster you can always use our custom writing service. Did you like this example? Having doubts about how to write your paper correctly? Get started. Leave your email and we will send a sample to you.
Email Get sample. Thank you! Get help with my paper. Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. You can leave an email and we will send it to you.
Didn't find the paper that you were looking for? What is your topic? Number of pages. Deadline 0 days left. Any subject. Pay if satisfied.
39. Writing a Type 1 (argument) essay: Score High IELTS Writing (General Training Module)
, time: 3:37Ban Smoking in Public Places Essay
Smoking should be banned in public places The government of the United States, should ban smoking in all public places because of the adverse effects of passive smoking on smokers, non-smokers and the environment. In the recent years, the population of people who smoke in the US has significantly increased. People still choose to smoke even when they have adequate knowledge of · Smoking in public places exposes a large number of people to harmful substances released from a cigarette. For instance, smoking causes coronary heart disease both to active and passive smokers. In the end, smoking causes the occurrences of stroke among individuals. Get your % original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours. Learn More. Smoking contributes to a · When enforcing anti-smoking laws, local, state and/or federal work to ensure domestic tranquility by banning harmful behaviors in public places. These smoking bans in public places prevent individual citizens from fighting his/her peers in order to preserve a healthy environment
No comments:
Post a Comment